Ethical Issues in Business IP Week 5 Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Ethical Issues in Business IP Week 5 - Essay Example Another vital aspect of ethics in business is ensuring safety in the workplace. Based on the fact that employees are major resources in any company, employers should take initiatives to safeguard them from high temperatures, poor ventilation, fire and poor lighting. In this way, illnesses that may increase the rate of absenteeism will be significantly reduced. Introduction As businesses engage each other in a stiff competition, some employers have taken initiatives to enhance the payments of their employees and senior managers as a way of retaining them and improving their productivity. However, some managers have little or no concern of the welfare of their employees thus rising the question of how much are investors willing to emulate ethics in the work places. One of the major ethical concerns is the amount of compensation and benefits provided to their employees and their immediate family members. In the same way, safety in the work places is a key issue that employers should not overlook. In this regard, I have chosen the topic of ethics in compensation of the employees and safety in the work places as a way of ensuring that employees are fairly treated in the work places. Similarly, my target audience is the employers and the investors who are focused at increasing their profits at the expense of their employees. ... Wages and benefits To ensure that employees remain loyal towards their companies, employers have major role to play of ensuring that salaries and benefits paid to their workers are sustainable and motivating. One of major issue that creates poor relationship between the employees and the employers is the high compensation paid to the executives while other employees are not taken into consideration. Majority of employers have various options about the amount of compensation and wages that is paid to their employees. For example, some companies believe that the mandated minimum salaries by the federal government are sufficient to maintain their employees (Robbins & Judge, 2007). In the same way, some employers believe they are at liberty to pay anything to the workers and as such employees should take any job regardless of the wages they receive. Investors should ensure ethics are upheld in their companies by providing flexible benefits. Some of the major benefits that a firm should g ive their employees include health insurance, paid vacations, training, paid sick leaves as well as retirement benefits among others. Additionally, employers should ensure flexible working hours to ensure that their employees address private matters that may affects the concentration of the workers thus reducing their productivity (Resnik, 2009). To develop professional abilities of their employees and make them focused on achieving their goals as well as those of the entire company, managers should apply advancement programs. Such programs should be undertaken during annual leaves or in the evenings after work. To ensure adequate compensation and flexible

Ethics Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words - 2

Ethics - Essay Example Rawls’s argument that we should maximin instead of maximize leads to a fascinating standoff, whereby the argument for maximin appeared not compelling, but it was straight additive maximization of utilitarian in a way that revealed the possible function associated with morality that people are expected to maximize. In fact, according to Rawls, the utilitarianism is not straight based on taking maximandum, which refers to the things that are to be maximized that is utility instead of the primary social goods. Moreover, the idea of maximizing the key social goods is not appealing, since it fails to pursue the maximization of utility. Therefore, the espousal of the ideal legitimacy in political Liberalism does not have an effect on the conclusions and arguments that are developed to reinforce the ideal with respect to justice as fairness in utilitarianism and Rawlsian theories (Arneson, 2000). There is another problem with the utilitarianism, which is associated with the tenuous a ssociation with liberalism, whereby in prominent situations of aggregate goods of numerous, people outweigh the few individuals. Moreover, utilitarianism appears to be committed to the majority over the minority, and it seems to be unfair or violating the fundamental rights and liberties. Therefore, utilitarianism retort is unfair since the mere handovers from outdated and pernicious moral conversions. On the other hand, Rawls’s arguments are in the first part, whereby he focuses on the conflicts between utilitarianism and people’s beliefs concerning justice and fairness. In fact, he provides diagnosis, which is unflattering in order to appeal to utilitarianism. Therefore, utilitarianism may seem to be appealing by taking over the model of decision-making that individuals make relating to their lives. However, there is a significant difficulty associated with implementing the model in a society with people suffering from sacrifice, whereby they are denied the chance to obtain the benefits. In this case, the official arguments, in the parties in the original state prefer the Rawlsian Maximin Principle, by turning the choice between rules related to making the decision under uncertain circumstance of maximizing expected utility instead of maximin. The formal argument of the Rawls’s assertion is supported by the psychological arguments related to parties in the original state that prefers the principles. In fact, ideas of psychological arguments related to Rawls’s principles do not have limitations of the strains of commitment, like utilitarianism. Moreover, Rawls maintains that people growing in a society governed by principles Rawls’s principles, they would end up valuing the principles and complying with them. Rawls’s principles are concerned with the worst off, whereby the society is committed to the well being of the well off. However, this is not the case with the utilitarianism, whereby it is easier to have the all egiance to a society, which is governed Rawls’s principles, compared to the society governed by utilitarianism. Making a comparison between the Rawls principles with the maximin rule and utilitarianism, there is a chance of utilitarianism given